From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
To: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
Cc: xenomai-core <xenomai@xenomai.org>
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC][PATCH 4/4] shorten overrun loops of periodic timers
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 09:55:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44E420E4.9050008@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17635.21607.931068.951138@domain.hid>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1384 bytes --]
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > > I am thinking again about this patch: some handlers need to be
> > > rewritten, for example the posix timers handler, because the handler
> > > relies on the fact that it is called for every timer expiry to compute
> > > the overruns count. So maybe this patch should come with the addition of
> > > an xntimer_getoverrun service that computes the overrun count using the
> > > tsc ?
> > >
> >
> > Mmh, that gets close to hrtimer_forward now: push an overdue timer to an
> > expiry date that is in the future and return the number of overruns. But
> > do we still want this optimisation of the broken path then? It starts
> > getting complex, probably adding more code than it is worth. I'm
> > starting to vote against my own patch...
>
> The code to compute the number of overruns from the tsc exists in
> xnpod_wait_thread_period, is not this just a matter of refactoring this
> code in an xntimer_getoverrun ?
>
That overrun calculation takes place in thread context, we were
discussing this for the timer handler. That means, if we generalise, we
would have to pass the overrun counter somehow from the handler to the
awakened thread. Would take another struct field, probably in xnthread.
On the other hand, if that could save code in the posix skin, it may
make sense.
Jan
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 249 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-17 7:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-03 7:01 [Xenomai-core] [RFC][PATCH 4/4] shorten overrun loops of periodic timers Jan Kiszka
2006-08-03 17:01 ` Philippe Gerum
2006-08-03 17:26 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2006-08-03 18:37 ` Jan Kiszka
2006-08-16 15:43 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2006-08-16 16:20 ` Jan Kiszka
2006-08-16 17:22 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2006-08-17 7:55 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2006-08-17 13:03 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2006-08-17 13:35 ` Jan Kiszka
2006-08-18 6:09 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44E420E4.9050008@domain.hid \
--to=jan.kiszka@domain.hid \
--cc=gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.