From: Andreas Steinmetz <ast@domdv.de>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
Willy Tarreau <wtarreau@hera.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mtosatti@redhat.com,
Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.34-pre1
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:35:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44E42A4C.4040100@domdv.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1155797331.4494.17.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> But maybe it's worth doing a user survey to find out what the users of
> 2.4 want... (and with that I mean users of the kernel.org 2.4 kernels,
> people who use enterprise distro kernels don't count for this since
> they'll not go to a newer released 2.4 anyway)
Currently I'm working with ARM based embedded systems. I prefer 2.4
kernels to 2.6 as they are smaller thus leaving more flash for jffs2.
Not speaking of the kernel a gcc 4.1.1 compile of code for a LPC2103
resulted in a clearly smaller binary as the same compile with gcc 3.4.
Thus I really would like to be able to use gcc 4.x with 2.4 kernels.
There are even kernel miscompiles with gcc 3.4 that might be fixed with
gcc 4 (one has to try).
--
Andreas Steinmetz SPAMmers use robotrap@domdv.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-17 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-16 22:36 Linux 2.4.34-pre1 Willy Tarreau
2006-08-16 23:54 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-17 5:16 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-17 6:48 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-17 8:35 ` Andreas Steinmetz [this message]
2006-08-17 8:50 ` Mikael Pettersson
2006-08-17 12:48 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-17 20:43 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-17 23:41 ` Gerd v. Egidy
2006-08-18 4:40 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-21 0:56 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-17 9:06 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-17 9:16 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2006-08-18 23:25 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-19 1:20 ` Grant Coady
2006-08-20 17:27 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-19 4:45 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-21 0:35 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-21 0:41 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-21 1:07 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-17 8:37 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-17 9:12 ` Thomas Voegtle
2006-08-18 22:48 ` Solar Designer
2006-08-18 23:11 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-18 23:27 ` Solar Designer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-17 7:57 Chris Rankin
2006-08-17 9:16 ` Thomas Backlund
2006-08-18 4:47 ` Willy Tarreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44E42A4C.4040100@domdv.de \
--to=ast@domdv.de \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikpe@it.uu.se \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=wtarreau@hera.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.