From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <44E5B93F.40603@domain.hid> Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 14:57:35 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] speed up building of posix apps References: <44E5ACFA.50905@domain.hid> <1155904681.4326.67.camel@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <1155904681.4326.67.camel@domain.hid> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF8E4ECDD9E8E50C7DF0B5969" Sender: jan.kiszka@domain.hid List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches, discussions\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: rpm@xenomai.org Cc: xenomai-core This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF8E4ECDD9E8E50C7DF0B5969 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Philippe Gerum wrote: > On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 14:05 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >=20 >> PS: What about the silence-libtool patch? I've heard neither ack nor >> nack so far. >=20 > Still pondering the libtool --module issue. >=20 Try a grep -r shouldnotlink `find /usr/lib/ -name "*.la"` to get an impression what kind of libraries were linked with --module and what most likely not. I cannot imagine they all do such "patching" like we. :)= Jan --------------enigF8E4ECDD9E8E50C7DF0B5969 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE5bk/niDOoMHTA+kRAuMaAJ96YCT0xSqIlbLQxM1lfKkyerRCFACdF1wa GkfAw8+ovoDrkOg8AZ1aHd0= =sR5C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF8E4ECDD9E8E50C7DF0B5969--