From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/5] -fstack-protector feature: Add the Kconfig option
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:10:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44E5BC2C.80708@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200608181605.19520.ak@suse.de>
Andi Kleen wrote:
>> the binary search argument in this case is moot, just having a config
>> option doesn't break anything compile wise and each later step is
>> self-compiling..
>
> Not true when the config used for the binary search has stack protector
> enabled.
>
oh? I thought I was pretty careful about that
looking over the patches again I can't find any reason for a non-compiling/working kernel; at any step..
can you show me the compile error you got or the bug you found?
Also, I generally like this order since this order allows you to bisect stackprotector patches itself, rather than the
artificial "add a bunch of dead code and then suddenly turn the light on" approach..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-18 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-16 16:48 [patch 0/5] -fstack-protector feature for the kernel (try 2) Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-16 16:49 ` [patch 1/5] -fstack-protector feature: annotate the PDA offsets Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-16 16:50 ` [patch 2/5] -fstack-protector feature: Add the Kconfig option Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-16 18:12 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-18 11:08 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-18 11:23 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-18 14:05 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-18 13:10 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2006-08-18 13:30 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-18 17:21 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-08-16 16:51 ` [patch 3/5] -fstack-protector feature: Add the canary field to the PDA area Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-16 16:52 ` [patch 4/5] -fstack-protector feature: Add the __stack_chk_fail() function Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-16 16:53 ` [patch 5/5] -fstack-protector feature: Enable the compiler flags in CFLAGS Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-16 18:55 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-08-16 19:24 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-18 11:15 ` [patch 0/5] -fstack-protector feature for the kernel (try 2) Andi Kleen
2006-08-18 11:29 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44E5BC2C.80708@linux.intel.com \
--to=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.