From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <44E9C535.3050400@domain.hid> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:37:41 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Oops on PPC405EP References: <44E9B5A1.3010102@domain.hid> <44E9BA20.4000607@domain.hid> <17641.49824.304831.889667@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <17641.49824.304831.889667@domain.hid> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD5078B1FB3FA5139661D727B" List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gilles Chanteperdrix Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD5078B1FB3FA5139661D727B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Heikki Lindholm wrote: > > Since your hardware AFAIK does not have an FPU, shouldn't you be=20 > > compiling Xenomai without hardware FPU support? >=20 > Maybe we could prevent this mistake in Kconfig ? >=20 I already wanted to ask the same. Do we have such a dependency on other archs as well? Jan --------------enigD5078B1FB3FA5139661D727B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE6cU1ncNeS9Q0k+IRAsRvAJ4jXMj/uxOg629n3PNfXigvGu6gEgCfRLr8 LNbQz2AE3lX9yL+eVCENEIo= =Xvqj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD5078B1FB3FA5139661D727B--