From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mohan Sundaram Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 08:21:19 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] New hardware Message-Id: <44EC0D2F.7050306@vsnl.com> List-Id: References: <1156175178.44e9d54a18bd1@www.inbox.lv> In-Reply-To: <1156175178.44e9d54a18bd1@www.inbox.lv> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Marek Kierdelewicz wrote: > Hi there, > >> I used a SunFire x2100 which has 2 Ghz Opteron and PCI-Xpress slot >> into which I plugged in a dual port gigE Intel PCI-Xpress card. > > What was the software configuration of this host? What kernel > have you used for the test (compiled for x86 or amd64; dual-core > aware sheduler or not). > > Out of the curiosity ... dual port nic generates one interrupt or two > per port? I asume the first is more probable. This leads to another > question - has interrupt been balanced between cores? > >> Got a raw forwarding performance of 800Kpps for 64B packets. This >> beat a CISCO 3845 which gave 600Kpps. > > Thanks for the input :). > > Right now my production border router (BGP+some firewall rules+some QoS, > vlans @ P4 3GHz Linux 2.6, 2xBroadcom PCI-X, 1xIntel E1000 PCI-X) is 91% > saturated (CPU) at peek hours and during the time it forwards 344,8Kpps > with avg. packet sized 69 bytes. > > I'll try to determine raw forwarding performance when box goes out > of production env, so we'll have a clear comparison picture. > > regards, The beauty was the price. $725 for the SUN hardware and $200 for the NIC card. The CISCO 3845 would cost 9K street minimum. Mohan _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc