From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Subject: Re: status of nf-HIPAC integration ?
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:29:23 +0200
Message-ID: <44EC3C13.5030506@trash.net>
References: <20060821145720.GA749@ekonomika.be>
	<44EC08DE.2080107@kernelproject.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: mbellion@hipac.org, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org,
	kulnet@kulnet.kuleuven.be,
	Steven Van Acker <deepstar+NRpGDEuW@singularity.be>
Return-path: <netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org>
To: Jeho Park <jhpark-nf@kernelproject.org>
In-Reply-To: <44EC08DE.2080107@kernelproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/netfilter-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org

Jeho Park wrote:
> todays, i tested thputs with smartbits (nf-hipac vs iptables) in the
> kernel 2.6.17.3
> result URL:
> http://www.kernelproject.org/people/jhpark/fw_thput_test1.htm
> 
> the result looks somewhat ugly because thput result is much low.
> but as you refer my result, you can compare thput of the iptables with
> that of the nf-hipac in the kernel 2.6.17.3

That indeed looks ugly (for iptables). How was the ruleset structured?
Could you put it on your page please?