From: Marc Perkel <marc@perkel.com>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: SATA 150 vs SATA 300
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:51:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44EDBD0C.9040501@perkel.com> (raw)
Another speed related question. How much faster are SATA II drives
compared to regular SATA drives in real life? And - does NCQ really
help? I'm just looking for a general guess in the form of, "The Disk IO
upgrading to SATA II with NCQ will generally be X% faster." What value is X?
next reply other threads:[~2006-08-24 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-24 14:51 Marc Perkel [this message]
2006-08-25 2:32 ` SATA 150 vs SATA 300 Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44EDBD0C.9040501@perkel.com \
--to=marc@perkel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.