From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael C Thompson Subject: exclude's effect with multiple rules Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 17:04:41 -0500 Message-ID: <44EF73F9.1010700@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k7PM54Og027494 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:05:04 -0400 Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com (e1.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.141]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k7PM529r006124 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:05:02 -0400 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e1.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k7PM4qLl003878 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:04:52 -0400 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/NCO v8.1.1) with ESMTP id k7PM4qWr227838 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:04:52 -0400 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k7PM4qdP023684 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:04:52 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (pendarric.austin.ibm.com [9.41.46.113]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k7PM4pdn023626 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:04:52 -0400 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: Linux Audit List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com Hey all, So if I have the following two rules, what should be expected behaviour? auditctl -a entry,always -S chmod auditctl -a exclude,always -S all ... Assume we can change the ordering. Thanks, Mike