From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: 3.0.3 freeze
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:47:50 -0400
Message-ID: <44F31E36.4050101@redhat.com>
References: <C118D911.EC6%Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <C118D911.EC6%Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>, veillard@redhat.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Keir Fraser wrote:

> API/ABI compatibility is not guaranteed at the low-level control-plane
> interfaces: that is instead provided at the XML-RPC level 

Which XML-RPC layer?

The one that's not been written yet, or the one we were
told would go away? :)

-- 
What is important?  What you want to be true, or what is true?