From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk>,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>,
veillard@redhat.com
Subject: Re: 3.0.3 freeze
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:12:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44F3240E.7030301@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C118DCEA.ECE%Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 28/8/06 5:47 pm, "Rik van Riel" <riel@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>> API/ABI compatibility is not guaranteed at the low-level control-plane
>>> interfaces: that is instead provided at the XML-RPC level
>> Which XML-RPC layer?
>>
>> The one that's not been written yet, or the one we were
>> told would go away? :)
>
> http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenApi
> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-api/
>
> I.e., the one that's being drafted and discussed right now, on the xen wiki
> and on the xen-api mailing list.
Are you seriously suggesting that people rely on the stability
of an API that hasn't even been created yet, and that people
should not be surprised when the current API breaks, because
they should have been using the one that doesn't exist yet?
Words fail me. At least, words I'd want to write down :)
--
What is important? What you want to be true, or what is true?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-28 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-22 16:03 3.0.3 freeze Ian Pratt
2006-08-22 16:34 ` Sean Dague
2006-08-22 21:00 ` Ryan Harper
2006-08-22 21:12 ` Subrahmanian, Raj
2006-08-25 0:53 ` Tuan Van
2006-08-28 14:58 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2006-08-28 15:08 ` Keir Fraser
2006-08-28 15:21 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2006-08-28 15:49 ` Daniel Veillard
2006-08-28 16:32 ` Keir Fraser
2006-08-28 16:47 ` Rik van Riel
2006-08-28 16:48 ` Keir Fraser
2006-08-28 17:12 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2006-08-28 17:19 ` Keir Fraser
2006-08-28 17:56 ` Daniel Veillard
2006-09-12 11:06 ` Anthony Wright
2006-09-12 11:40 ` Ian Pratt
2006-09-12 12:55 ` Anthony Wright
2006-09-12 13:45 ` Matt Ayres
2006-09-12 22:00 ` John Lenz
2006-09-13 9:33 ` Nicholas Lee
2006-09-19 11:21 ` Anthony Wright
2006-09-19 12:56 ` Keir Fraser
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-28 15:22 Ian Pratt
2006-08-28 16:48 Ian Pratt
2006-08-28 17:03 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2006-08-28 20:16 ` Daniel Veillard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44F3240E.7030301@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=veillard@redhat.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.