From: Florent Guiliani <fguiliani@perinfo.com>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: tun99 not trapped by tun+
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:26:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44F3FA24.2070004@perinfo.com> (raw)
I've about 30 VPN with vtun who use tunXX interfaces (from tun0 to
tun40). I've
others VPN with OpenVPN but all is using only one interface: tun99.
For some strange reasons a rule who match in:tun+/out:any doesn't match
packets from tun99.
Any Idea?
Florent,
reply other threads:[~2006-08-29 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44F3FA24.2070004@perinfo.com \
--to=fguiliani@perinfo.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.