From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: LVS-NAT and source routing Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:52:45 +0200 Message-ID: <44F4389D.6040601@trash.net> References: <20060829073751.GB23278@verge.net.au> <44F4039D.2060909@trash.net> <20060829.023138.120676636.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: krb@irridia.com, ratz@drugphish.ch, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, dave@jamsoft.com, ja@ssi.bg, horms@verge.net.au, jmack@wm7d.net, fsarwari@exchangesolutions.com Return-path: To: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20060829.023138.120676636.davem@davemloft.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org David Miller wrote: > From: Patrick McHardy > Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:06:37 +0200 > > >>but you could make the whole thing depend on CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES. > > > IPSEC can make the saddr changes matter too. BTW it shows a technical > issue with nf_ip_reroute(), since it only checks for changes to > saddr/daddr/tos when even things like port changes can make IPSEC > generate a different route. Right. It also ignores nfmark changes, which is not valid anymore since nfnetlink_queue allows to change these. I'm going to fix it up and send the patch with my next batch of netfilter patches.