From: Andrew Theurer <habanero@us.ibm.com>
To: "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>
Cc: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Optimizing x86-64 xenlinux using global pagesfor user mode (take 2)
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 10:26:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44F5AE28.20902@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8FFF7E42E93CC646B632AB40643802A8D3A302@scsmsx412.amr.corp.intel.com>
Nakajima, Jun wrote:
> Andrew Theurer wrote:
>
>> Ian Pratt wrote:
>>
>>>> The previous patch had a problem with the builder, which constructs
>>>> the initial page tables with the USER bit on. And Xen couldn't
>>>> distinguish kernel or use pages. It was partially checked avoiding
>>>> the bug, and it's finished with this patch.
>>>>
>>> Thanks. Have you any updated benchmark numbers as the bug could have
>>> been giving quite a performance boost before.
>>>
>
> Looks like part of the boost was realized by the bug, but I still see
> consistent and visible improvements with lmbench. If I turn on the
> global bits for the kernel pages as well, I see more improvements, which
> are comparable with or better than before. I think we need to do macro
> benchmarks to see how this helps.
>
>
>> FWIW, I had been running more extensive testing on changeset 11225
>> (before global-bit) and 11229 (global-bit with revert/fix for dom0
>> builder), and they do not match the initial testing I did with rev
>> 11118 + global_1 patch. In fact, I am not seeing really any
>> improvement. I am not sure what is wrong. Should I just test
>> xen-unstable-tip+newest_patch and see where we stand?
>>
>>
>
> Yes, please. You shouldn't have observed any performance difference
> between 11225 and 11229 because the changeset 11226 did not enable the
> global bit.
OK, then that would explain it :) I'll run tip+ your latest patch.
-Andrew Theurer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-30 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-30 15:18 [PATCH] Optimizing x86-64 xenlinux using global pagesfor user mode (take 2) Nakajima, Jun
2006-08-30 15:26 ` Andrew Theurer [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-30 10:06 Ian Pratt
2006-08-30 14:35 ` Andrew Theurer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44F5AE28.20902@us.ibm.com \
--to=habanero@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.