From: Shaya Potter <spotter@cs.columbia.edu>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, unionfs@fsl.cs.sunysb.edu
Subject: Re: bug in nfs in 2.6.18-rc5?
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:20:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44F6FE58.9020701@cs.columbia.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44F6F80F.1000202@cs.columbia.edu>
Shaya Potter wrote:
> so I'm trying to use unionfs, cachefs and nfs, as cachefs is 2.6.18-rc5
> right now, thats what I'm testing, but I hit an oops.
>
> basically unionfs's lookup does a "lookup_one_len()" on the underlying fs.
>
> lookup_one_len() calls __lookup_hash()
>
> __lookup_hash() is called as "__lookup_hash(&this, base, NULL)"
>
> now that NULL is important. that's the nameidata entry of __lookup_hash()
>
> __lookup_hash() ends up calling the underlying fs's lookup op, i.e.
> nfs_lookup()
>
> nfs_lookup() calls nfs_reval_fsid(nd->mnt, dir, &fhandle, &fattr);
>
> see the bug? :)
>
> This doesn't seem like a unionfs bug, as one should be able to call
> lookup_one_len() on an NFS fs.
ok my "fix" is basically that nfs_reval_fsid() uses the nd->mnt to get
to mnt->mnt_root.
I basically switched it to take a dentry and I call it as
nfs_reval_fsid(dentry->d_sb->s_root, dir.....)
have no clue if this is correct, but it doesn't oops anymore and seems
to "work".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-31 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-31 14:54 bug in nfs in 2.6.18-rc5? Shaya Potter
2006-08-31 15:20 ` Shaya Potter [this message]
2006-08-31 16:03 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-08-31 16:24 ` Shaya Potter
2006-08-31 16:43 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-08-31 16:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-08-31 17:33 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-08-31 16:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44F6FE58.9020701@cs.columbia.edu \
--to=spotter@cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=unionfs@fsl.cs.sunysb.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.