Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 4 Sep 2006 01:34:43 +0200 > "J.A. Magallón" wrote: > >> On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 01:58:18 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: >> >>> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.18-rc5/2.6.18-rc5-mm1/ >>> >> Err, my burner got lost this summer ;). >> This is really not a bug of _this_ kernel, because I noticed it dissapeared >> with the previous release also, just before going on vacation... But as it >> did not come back with this relase, I report it here. >> >> Last kernel that I have tried that worked was 2.6.18-rc2-mm1. With this >> relase, it is gone still. dmesg for both kernels is below. >> The only thing I hace noticed is the different IRQ assignment between >> them. >> >> Any ideas ? TIA. >> >> dmesg for rc2-mm1: >> scsi0 : ata_piix >> ata1.00: ATAPI, max UDMA/33 >> ata1.01: ATAPI, max MWDMA0, CDB intr >> ata1.00: configured for UDMA/33 >> ata1.01: configured for PIO3 >> Vendor: HL-DT-ST Model: DVDRAM GSA-4120B Rev: A111 >> Type: CD-ROM ANSI SCSI revision: 05 >> Vendor: IOMEGA Model: ZIP 250 Rev: 51.G >> Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 >> >> dmesg for rc5-mm1: >> ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (device reports illegal type, err_mask=0x0) Hmmm... Strange. The related code hasn't changed much between rc2-mm1 and rc5-mm1. We're talking about 2.6.18-rc2-mm1 and 2.6.18-rc5-mm1, right? Can you try the attached patch and report what the kernel says? -- tejun