From: Dmitri <dk-netfilter@nth.ca>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: matching -d to a given interface without specifying ip address
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:42:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44FD003D.7080509@nth.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <009601c6cfdf$c4406910$0101000a@tanjian>
Rob Sterenborg wrote:
>> Is there a way to define a condition "those packets whose destination
>> is the IP address of the given interface" without specifying the
>> actual IP address? (it changes, thus needs to be detected and updated)
>
> No. -d expects an IP address.
I was looking for a (non-existent) option like
--dest-ip-address-matches-that-of eth1. Meaning the connection is
addressed to the box, as opposed to passing through it to some other
machine but to the same port.
The problem with specifying an IP is that it may change, which breaks
the rules and requires an update (and detection as well). Event for a
static IP, that's an extra dependency to watch out for.
> What is it exactly what you want to accomplish?
Maybe this is contrived and not a good method..
I want the above-described kind of option, to pick out and DNAT
connections on a certain port (say, http) directed at the box, but not
those on the same port but directed elsewhere (like google being
accessed through the box being the gateway). Purpose - to
DNAT-encapsulate some service by the box.
(It doesn't matter from which direction it came, on which interface, its
contents, etc. - only the destination ip.)
If i say "-d <ip.of.the.box> --dport 80 -j DNAT ..", that works, but it
introduces the unwanted dependency on the actual IP value.
If i say "-i <interface> --dport 80..." for an internal interface, that
catches anything, whether it was meant for the box or google.
Thanks,
--Dmitri
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-05 4:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-02 22:32 matching -d to a given interface without specifying ip address Dmitri
2006-09-04 5:05 ` Rob Sterenborg
2006-09-05 4:42 ` Dmitri [this message]
2006-09-05 4:43 ` Rob Sterenborg
2006-09-08 2:03 ` Dmitri
2006-09-06 18:11 ` Danny Rathjens
2006-09-08 1:42 ` Dmitri
2006-09-08 9:44 ` Pascal Hambourg
2006-09-08 9:26 ` Pascal Hambourg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44FD003D.7080509@nth.ca \
--to=dk-netfilter@nth.ca \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.