From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@domain.hid>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
Cc: xenomai-core <xenomai@xenomai.org>
Subject: [Xenomai-core] Re: Move rtdm_irq_enable close to rtdm_irq_request
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 17:38:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44FD99E9.6030500@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44FD7463.7010601@domain.hid>
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> in the process of preparing to merge rtdm_irq_enable into
> rtdm_irq_request I would like to check if the attached patch is ok, thus
> we could finally drop rtdm_irq_enable once the API is refactored. Please
> check carefully when the first IRQs may happen and what the handler
> expects to be initialised! SJA1000 /should/ be ok as it works with
> shared IRQs, but MSCAN does not (why, BTW?) and /may/ stumble.
OK. Why should I use shared interrupts if there is no need? Most
embedded PowerPC systems have a dedicated interrupt source.
Wolfgang.
> Jan
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Index: ksrc/drivers/can/mscan/rtcan_mscan.c
> ===================================================================
> --- ksrc/drivers/can/mscan/rtcan_mscan.c (revision 1559)
> +++ ksrc/drivers/can/mscan/rtcan_mscan.c (working copy)
> @@ -801,7 +801,8 @@ int __init rtcan_mscan_init_one(int idx)
> printk("ERROR! rtdm_irq_request for IRQ %d failed\n", irq);
> goto out_dev_free;
> }
> -
> + rtdm_irq_enable(&dev->irq_handle);
> +
> mscan_chip_config(regs);
>
>
> @@ -814,8 +815,6 @@ int __init rtcan_mscan_init_one(int idx)
>
> rtcan_mscan_create_proc(dev);
>
> - rtdm_irq_enable(&dev->irq_handle);
> -
> /* Remember initialized devices */
> rtcan_mscan_devs[idx] = dev;
>
> Index: ksrc/drivers/can/sja1000/rtcan_sja1000.c
> ===================================================================
> --- ksrc/drivers/can/sja1000/rtcan_sja1000.c (revision 1559)
> +++ ksrc/drivers/can/sja1000/rtcan_sja1000.c (working copy)
> @@ -747,6 +747,7 @@ int rtcan_sja1000_register(struct rtcan_
> printk("ERROR! IRQ %d busy or invalid (code=%d)!\n", chip->irq_num, ret);
> return ret;
> }
> + rtdm_irq_enable(&dev->irq_handle);
>
> sja1000_chip_config(dev);
>
> @@ -759,8 +760,6 @@ int rtcan_sja1000_register(struct rtcan_
>
> rtcan_sja_create_proc(dev);
>
> - rtdm_irq_enable(&dev->irq_handle);
> -
> return 0;
>
> out_irq_free:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-05 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-05 12:58 [Xenomai-core] Move rtdm_irq_enable close to rtdm_irq_request Jan Kiszka
2006-09-05 15:38 ` Wolfgang Grandegger [this message]
2006-09-05 16:02 ` [Xenomai-core] " Jan Kiszka
2006-09-05 19:10 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2006-09-06 6:36 ` Jan Kiszka
2006-09-06 8:59 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2006-09-06 9:26 ` Jan Kiszka
2006-09-06 12:27 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2006-09-06 14:54 ` Jan Kiszka
2006-09-06 15:08 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2006-09-06 15:54 ` Jan Kiszka
2006-09-06 17:23 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2006-09-06 18:13 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44FD99E9.6030500@domain.hid \
--to=wg@domain.hid \
--cc=jan.kiszka@domain.hid \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.