From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: sergio@sergiomb.no-ip.org
Cc: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
bjorn.helgaas@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
greg@kroah.com, harmon@ksu.edu, Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] take 4 Re: VIA IRQ quirk, another (embarrassing) suggestion.
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 21:47:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44FE28CB.6070005@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1157505255.3145.32.camel@localhost.portugal>
Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 11:13 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 11:33 -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 12:54:07PM +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I don't know if this is a real question. Have we VIA products on PCI
>>>>> card, running on not VIA chip sets ?
>>>> Yes. Certainly for on-board devices too.
>>> OK , other argument.
>>> We have billions of VIA chip sets with VIA PCI on-board and
>>> VIA PCI on others chip sets, if exists, are a very few.
>>> So, because some exceptions, we shouldn't stop a resolution of a very
>>> large % of the cases.
>> No thanks. As VIA SATA maintainer, I like being able to use my VIA SATA
>> PCI card.
>>
>> Jeff
>
> I have 2 computer with 2 different Asrock
> (http://www.asrock.com/product/775Dual-880Pro.htm) boards, both have a
> VIA8237 and a VIA SATA, and both are quirked wrongly, when I use kernels
> 2.6.17+ .
> And if I haven't bought this 2 computers in a supermarket, I won't be
> here discussion this subjects.
>
> So I like to remember
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/7/28/264
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/9/4/111 ( that confirm a VIA SATA on XT-PIC
> mode ) http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/9/1/106 )
>
> So VIA SATA needs my patch or Daniel Drake patch to _WORK_ .
No argument.
I'm just saying that you cannot avoid the VIA-device-not-on-VIA-chipset
case. I don't care which patch is used, as long as _both_ cases work.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-06 1:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-04 0:42 VIA IRQ quirk fixup only in XT-PIC mode Take 3 Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-09-04 0:58 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-04 5:44 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-03 13:52 ` Daniel Drake
2006-09-04 5:55 ` VIA IRQ quirk, another (embarrassing) suggestion Chris Wedgwood
2006-09-04 7:43 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-04 11:54 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-09-04 12:14 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-04 18:33 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-09-05 14:55 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-09-05 15:13 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-06 1:14 ` [PATCH] take 4 " Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-09-06 1:47 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2006-09-05 15:46 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-04 16:25 ` VIA IRQ quirk fixup only in XT-PIC mode Take 3 Sergio Monteiro Basto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44FE28CB.6070005@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=dsd@gentoo.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=harmon@ksu.edu \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sergio@sergiomb.no-ip.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.