From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sollube.sarenet.es (mx1.sarenet.es [194.30.0.37]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8149567B82 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2006 17:48:36 +1000 (EST) Received: from ntvir (unknown [212.81.206.17]) by sollube.sarenet.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A91374BD for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2006 09:30:15 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44FE7907.2090209@aotek.es> Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 09:30:15 +0200 From: Txema Lopez MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: MPC5200 SPI interface. Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=------------030607010907020204020809 List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030607010907020204020809 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi all, We are developping a Lite5200B based custom board and we are planning to connect some SPI peripherals. But we are not sure about what MPC5200 SPI interface choose. Does anyone know what are the advantages/disadvantages of use the MPC5200 SPI dedicated interface or an PSC (PSC3) as the SPI interface?. The linux kernel includes both interfaces but we can not see in the documentation anything about this aspect. Any kind of information will be welcomed. Best Regards, José María López. --------------030607010907020204020809 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=utf-8; name="tlopez.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="tlopez.vcf" begin:vcard fn:Jose Maria Lopez n:Lopez;Jose Maria org:Fagor Automation S. Coop. adr:;;San Andres 19. Apdo. 144;Arrasate-Mondragon;;20500;Spain email;internet:tlopez@aotek.es title:Sotware engineer tel;work:(34) 943719200 tel;fax:(34) 943791712 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.fagorautomation.es version:2.1 end:vcard --------------030607010907020204020809--