All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>,
	linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Ben Collins <bcollins@ubuntu.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.18-rc5-mm1 + all hotfixes -- INFO: possible recursive	locking detected
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 18:50:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44FEFC68.90201@s5r6.in-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44FE751E.4030505@s5r6.in-berlin.de>

I wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Or maybe it's older. Nodemgr takes class->subsys.rwsem and
>> device.bus->subsys.rwsem. It always did. Could there be a change in
>> driver core which makes this recursive? Or has it always been recursive?
>> For example,
>>
>> static void nodemgr_update_pdrv(struct node_entry *ne)
>> {
>> 	struct unit_directory *ud;
>> 	struct hpsb_protocol_driver *pdrv;
>> 	struct class *class = &nodemgr_ud_class;
>> 	struct class_device *cdev;
>>
>> 	down_read(&class->subsys.rwsem);
>> 	list_for_each_entry(cdev, &class->children, node) {

This may be wrong anyway. According to include/linux/device.h,
class->sem should be used to protect access to class->children. There
are more places in nodemgr of this sort.

>> 		ud = container_of(cdev, struct unit_directory, class_dev);
>> 		if (ud->ne != ne || !ud->device.driver)
>> 			continue;
>>
>> 		pdrv = container_of(ud->device.driver, struct hpsb_protocol_driver, driver);
>>
>> 		if (pdrv->update && pdrv->update(ud)) {
>> 			down_write(&ud->device.bus->subsys.rwsem);
>> 			device_release_driver(&ud->device);
>> 			up_write(&ud->device.bus->subsys.rwsem);
>> 		}
>> 	}
>> 	up_read(&class->subsys.rwsem);
>> }
> 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> perhaps you could advise on this. It appears from grepping through the
> sources that drivers/ieee1394/nodemgr.c is the only one with mixed
> access to device.bus->subsys.rwsem and class->subsys.rwsem.
> 
> Other usages of subsys.rwsem that I found are:
> 1a.) dev->bus->subsys.rwsem
> driver/ide/ide-proc.c and drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c take
> dev->bus->subsys.rwsem. drivers/pnp/card.c takes dev.bus->subsys.rwsem.
> 
> 1b.) driver.bus->subsys.rwsem
> drivers/s390/net/qeth_proc.c takes driver.bus->subsys.rwsem.
> 
> 2.) class->subsys.rwsem
> drivers/scsi/hosts.c takes class->subsys.rwsem.
> 
> 3.) bustype.subsys.rwsem
> drivers/input/serio/serio.c takes serio_bus.subsys.rwsem.
> drivers/input/gameport/gameport.c takes gameport_bus.subsys.rwsem.
> drivers/base/power/shutdown.c takes devices_subsys.rwsem.
> drivers/usb/core/devices.c and devio.c take usb_bus_type.subsys.rwsem.
> 
> Do class->subsys.rwsem, bus->subsys.rwsem, and bus_type.subsys.rwsem
> point to identical or different lock instances?
> 
> Either way, could it hurt to convert nodemgr to uniformly use
> ieee1394_bus_type.subsys.rwsem all over the place?
> 
> Thanks,


-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-==- =--= --==-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/

  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-06 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-05 17:37 2.6.18-rc5-mm1 + all hotfixes -- INFO: possible recursive locking detected Miles Lane
2006-09-05 18:13 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-05 18:16   ` Miles Lane
2006-09-05 19:03     ` Stefan Richter
2006-09-05 19:19       ` Miles Lane
2006-09-05 19:51         ` Stefan Richter
2006-09-05 19:23   ` Stefan Richter
2006-09-05 21:07     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-09-05 22:27       ` Stefan Richter
2006-09-06  0:10         ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-06  7:13     ` Stefan Richter
2006-09-06 16:50       ` Stefan Richter [this message]
2006-09-06 17:04         ` [RFT PATCH 1/2] ieee1394: nodemgr: fix rwsem recursion Stefan Richter
2006-09-06 17:06           ` [RFT PATCH 2/2] ieee1394: nodemgr: grab class.subsys.rwsem in nodemgr_resume_ne Stefan Richter
2006-09-07 22:45         ` 2.6.18-rc5-mm1 + all hotfixes -- INFO: possible recursive locking detected Miles Lane
2006-09-07 23:23           ` Stefan Richter
2006-09-06 22:35       ` Greg KH
2006-09-05 19:49   ` Miles Lane
2006-09-05 20:19     ` Stefan Richter
2006-09-05 20:26       ` Stefan Richter
2006-09-05 20:33       ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-06  6:39 ` Arjan van de Ven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44FEFC68.90201@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    --to=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=bcollins@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=miles.lane@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.