From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-in-10.arcor-online.net (mail-in-10.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.arcor.de", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5203DDF13 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:13:05 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20070423235502.734e6e67@localhost.localdomain> References: <20070422232658.5f427fd3@localhost.localdomain> <200704222349.42368.arnd@arndb.de> <20070423101427.3a1d4983@localhost.localdomain> <20070423075957.GA22811@infradead.org> <20070423235502.734e6e67@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <44c9a2b88950e3848d2c4e457641eb9b@kernel.crashing.org> From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] PCMCIA support for 8xx using platform devices Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:12:58 +0200 To: Vitaly Bordug Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org, lkml , Arnd Bergmann List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , >> That's a horrible argument. Please do it properly, and let arch/ppc >> die as it should. We shouldn't be adding anything to it anymore >> anyway. >> > I understand your point, but we shouldn't trash existing bits either. Why not? The things that haven't been ported over yet obviously are unmaintained. If we can make the few remaining board ports in there utterly broken, we can finally remove arch/ppc/ completely :-) Since nothing new gets added to arch/ppc/ anymore, anyone who wants it can get it from an older kernel tree, no? [Yes, I'm half joking. No, not fully.] Segher From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753641AbXDWVNF (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:13:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754183AbXDWVNE (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:13:04 -0400 Received: from mail-in-10.arcor-online.net ([151.189.21.50]:39596 "EHLO mail-in-10.arcor-online.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753670AbXDWVNC (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:13:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070423235502.734e6e67@localhost.localdomain> References: <20070422232658.5f427fd3@localhost.localdomain> <200704222349.42368.arnd@arndb.de> <20070423101427.3a1d4983@localhost.localdomain> <20070423075957.GA22811@infradead.org> <20070423235502.734e6e67@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <44c9a2b88950e3848d2c4e457641eb9b@kernel.crashing.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Christoph Hellwig , lkml From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] PCMCIA support for 8xx using platform devices Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:12:58 +0200 To: Vitaly Bordug X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.623) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> That's a horrible argument. Please do it properly, and let arch/ppc >> die as it should. We shouldn't be adding anything to it anymore >> anyway. >> > I understand your point, but we shouldn't trash existing bits either. Why not? The things that haven't been ported over yet obviously are unmaintained. If we can make the few remaining board ports in there utterly broken, we can finally remove arch/ppc/ completely :-) Since nothing new gets added to arch/ppc/ anymore, anyone who wants it can get it from an older kernel tree, no? [Yes, I'm half joking. No, not fully.] Segher