From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lowell Gilbert References: <447fdp9oue.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <0b7ab1b8-8d53-069a-49b6-a3f289c0b43c@xenomai.org> <441t3rlwfe.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20160620152246.GA18662@hermes.click-hack.org> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 13:15:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160620152246.GA18662@hermes.click-hack.org> (Gilles Chanteperdrix's message of "Mon, 20 Jun 2016 17:22:46 +0200") Message-ID: <44wpljkchx.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Xenomai] slackspot List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: xenomai@xenomai.org Gilles Chanteperdrix writes: > There is one possibility: if your thread runs with the > SCHED_OTHER/SCHED_WEAK scheduling policy, I would not expect the > relaxes to trigger anything, as you have been asking for them by > choosing to use these policies. Yes, I should have mentioned that topic. I have run this under both SCHED_FIFO and SCHED_RR.