From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sven 'Darkman' Michels Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 23:53:10 +0000 Subject: Re: mlmmj-1.2.12-RC1 released Message-Id: <4500B0E6.4050101@darkman.de> List-Id: References: <34f6b3c998e8d4bb4bd464d07c87532c@mail.n0rd.dk> In-Reply-To: <34f6b3c998e8d4bb4bd464d07c87532c@mail.n0rd.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Morten K. Poulsen wrote: >> Most of the patch is simplyfing the "voodoo" and making it less ugly, >> which I felt should be done because it got even more ugly with the mime >> stuff in it. This should be done even without the mime stuff. > > I still do not like the idea of having MIME parsing in the list manager, but I will have another look at the patch after the release of mlmmj-1.2.12. Well, i just want to point out some, at least for me, important point: mlmmj offers the functionality of adding a footer to a mail (which is imho one of the best features for the end user, because you can add the unsubscribe stuff to every mail and normally everyone should see it - i know that this doesn't work for all ppl, but hell.. ;). If mlmmj offers such a feature, it works like a MUA. As a MUA it should be able to follow the normal mail standards, and in some cases this may the usage of mime. For that case mlmmj should handle the footer stuff by itself. At the moment, mlmmj would break some mails by simply add a footer to the end, and i think this is not what we want, do we? So, this is not a blame to your/mmj or anyones work, its just my point of view for this case ;) Regards, Darkman -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFALDmQoCguWUBzBwRAqh2AJ9xIIq4q3sUBWNxaxNZS04ZlEvn6ACfV2/6 dRYrQgUPqY3nilFYHKGTGGo=bwCf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----