From: Christian Schmid <webmaster@rapidforum.com>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Critical xfs bug in 2.6.17.11?
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 01:35:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4504A12C.9090608@rapidforum.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609101835390.29937@p34.internal.lan>
I am using www.linuxfromscratch.org. Kernel is vanilla 2.6.17.11 from kernel.org, xfsprogs is 2.7.3,
libc is 2.3.3. I was not doing anything special. In fact its a heavy-duty tmpfs with up to 300
write-streams at once, reads and deletes. So basically a heavy stress-test on a SMP. Maybe a
race-condition? Pure speculations from my side. But memory is ok. Memory-test with ECC disabled ran
through 12 hours without any errors. ECC is on now of course, so the possibility of a simple
hardware problem is eliminated from my side.
Justin Piszcz wrote:
> ACK, scary, will wait for Nathan Scott's/other SGI members reply on this
> one...
>
> I have not had that happen to me yet, what were you doing that caused
> the problem? Is it repeatable? Have you checked the XFS FAQ for the FS
> fix for 2.6.17-17.6? just to check if there is indeed any problems
> (basically an xfs check on your FS), if you do it, dont use knoppix
> 5.0.2 (contains the 2.6.17 XFS corruption bug), use 4.0.2.
>
> Justin.
>
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Christian Schmid wrote:
>
>> This file-system was created 2 days before with the same kernel.
>>
>> Justin Piszcz wrote:
>>
>>> I hope this is not a repeat of 2.6.17 -> 2.6.17.6..
>>>
>>> $ grep -i xfs ChangeLog-2.6.17.*
>>> ChangeLog-2.6.17.7: XFS: corruption fix
>>> ChangeLog-2.6.17.7: check in xfs_dir2_leafn_remove() fails every
>>> time and xfs_dir2_shrink_inode()
>>>
>>> It appears the only changes to the XFS code though went into 2.6.17.7
>>> so I am not sure what you are seeing there, had you fixed your
>>> filesystem from the 2.6.17 -> .17.6 bug?
>>>
>>> Justin.
>>>
>>> On Sun, 10 Sep 2006, Christian Schmid wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello.
>>>>
>>>> Instead of a tmpfs, I use a raid 10 softraid. Unfortunately it
>>>> crashed after 10 hours of extreme activities (read/block-writes with
>>>> up to 250 streams/deletes)
>>>>
>>>> 12 gb memory-test successful. 2 cpu xeon smp system.
>>>>
>>>> Tell me if this helps you:
>>>>
>>>> Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel: [87433.143498] 0x0: 58 41 47 46 00
>>>> 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 04 34 a0 Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel:
>>>> [87433.143672] Filesystem "md5": XFS internal error
>>>> xfs_alloc_read_agf at line 2176 of file fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c. Caller
>>>> 0xfffffff
>>>> f80314069 Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel: [87433.143904] Sep 9
>>>> 18:08:49 inode430 kernel: [87433.143905] Call Trace:
>>>> <ffffffff8033c909>{xfs_corruption_error+244}
>>>> Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel: [87433.143995]
>>>> <ffffffff80346efa>{xfs_iext_insert+65}
>>>> <ffffffff803588d1>{xfs_trans_read_buf+203}
>>>> Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel: [87433.144353]
>>>> <ffffffff803121d9>{xfs_alloc_read_agf+281}
>>>> <ffffffff80314069>{xfs_alloc_fix_freelist+356}
>>>> Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel: [87433.144628]
>>>> <ffffffff80314069>{xfs_alloc_fix_freelist+356}
>>>> <ffffffff80515a1f>{__down_read+18} Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel:
>>>> [87433.144855] <ffffffff8031450f>{xfs_alloc_vextent+289}
>>>> <ffffffff80323945>{xfs_bmapi+4061}
>>>> Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel: [87433.145091]
>>>> <ffffffff803215ba>{xfs_bmap_search_multi_extents+175} Sep 9
>>>> 18:08:49 inode430 kernel: [87433.145226]
>>>> <ffffffff80349aad>{xfs_iomap_write_allocate+675}
>>>> <ffffffff80348c29>{xfs_iomap+701} Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel:
>>>> [87433.145473] <ffffffff803797f1>{generic_make_request+515}
>>>> <ffffffff803632f3>{xfs_map_blocks+67}
>>>> Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel: [87433.145846]
>>>> <ffffffff80363a09>{xfs_page_state_convert+722}
>>>> <ffffffff80364344>{xfs_vm_writepage+179} Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430
>>>> kernel: [87433.146079] <ffffffff802986ed>{mpage_writepages+459}
>>>> <ffffffff80364291>{xfs_vm_writepage+0}
>>>> Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel: [87433.146330]
>>>> <ffffffff802553c1>{do_writepages+41}
>>>> <ffffffff80296de0>{__writeback_single_inode+559}
>>>> Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel: [87433.146583]
>>>> <ffffffff8022a82c>{default_wake_function+0}
>>>> <ffffffff8022a82c>{default_wake_function+0}
>>>> Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel: [87433.146847]
>>>> <ffffffff80357f56>{xfs_trans_first_ail+28}
>>>> <ffffffff802974be>{sync_sb_inodes+501}
>>>> Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel: [87433.147230]
>>>> <ffffffff802444b4>{keventd_create_kthread+0}
>>>> <ffffffff802977cd>{writeback_inodes+144}
>>>> Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel: [87433.147463]
>>>> <ffffffff802551fc>{wb_kupdate+148} <ffffffff80255bfd>{pdflush+313}
>>>> Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel: [87433.147825]
>>>> <ffffffff80255168>{wb_kupdate+0} <ffffffff80255ac4>{pdflush+0}
>>>> Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel: [87433.148142]
>>>> <ffffffff80244479>{kthread+218} <ffffffff8020a992>{child_rip+8}
>>>> Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel: [87433.148420]
>>>> <ffffffff802444b4>{keventd_create_kthread+0}
>>>> <ffffffff8024439f>{kthread+0}
>>>> Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel: [87433.148775]
>>>> <ffffffff8020a98a>{child_rip+0} Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel:
>>>> [87433.149105] Filesystem "md5": XFS internal error xfs_trans_cancel
>>>> at line 1150 of file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c. Caller 0xffffffff8
>>>> 0349bf8 Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel: [87433.149262] Sep 9
>>>> 18:08:49 inode430 kernel: [87433.149263] Call Trace:
>>>> <ffffffff803574e9>{xfs_trans_cancel+111} Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430
>>>> kernel: [87433.149348]
>>>> <ffffffff80349bf8>{xfs_iomap_write_allocate+1006}
>>>> <ffffffff80348c29>{xfs_iomap+701} Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel:
>>>> [87433.149568] <ffffffff803797f1>{generic_make_request+515}
>>>> <ffffffff803632f3>{xfs_map_blocks+67}
>>>> Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel: [87433.149847]
>>>> <ffffffff80363a09>{xfs_page_state_convert+722}
>>>> <ffffffff80364344>{xfs_vm_writepage+179} Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430
>>>> kernel: [87433.150169] <ffffffff802986ed>{mpage_writepages+459}
>>>> <ffffffff80364291>{xfs_vm_writepage+0}
>>>> Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel: [87433.150435]
>>>> <ffffffff802553c1>{do_writepages+41}
>>>> <ffffffff80296de0>{__writeback_single_inode+559}
>>>> Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel: [87433.150593]
>>>> <ffffffff8022a82c>{default_wake_function+0}
>>>> <ffffffff8022a82c>{default_wake_function+0}
>>>> Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel: [87433.150807]
>>>> <ffffffff80357f56>{xfs_trans_first_ail+28}
>>>> <ffffffff802974be>{sync_sb_inodes+501}
>>>> Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel: [87433.151042]
>>>> <ffffffff802444b4>{keventd_create_kthread+0}
>>>> <ffffffff802977cd>{writeback_inodes+144}
>>>> Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel: [87433.151271]
>>>> <ffffffff802551fc>{wb_kupdate+148} <ffffffff80255bfd>{pdflush+313}
>>>> Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel: [87433.151439]
>>>> <ffffffff80255168>{wb_kupdate+0} <ffffffff80255ac4>{pdflush+0}
>>>> Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel: [87433.151680]
>>>> <ffffffff80244479>{kthread+218} <ffffffff8020a992>{child_rip+8}
>>>> Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel: [87433.151922]
>>>> <ffffffff802444b4>{keventd_create_kthread+0}
>>>> <ffffffff8024439f>{kthread+0}
>>>> Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel: [87433.152086]
>>>> <ffffffff8020a98a>{child_rip+0} Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel:
>>>> [87433.152489] xfs_force_shutdown(md5,0x8) called from line 1151 of
>>>> file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c. Return address = 0xffffffff80357507
>>>> Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel: [87433.168623] Filesystem "md5":
>>>> Corruption of in-memory data detected. Shutting down filesystem: md5
>>>> Sep 9 18:08:49 inode430 kernel: [87433.168903] Please umount the
>>>> filesystem, and rectify the problem(s)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-10 23:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-10 13:37 Critical xfs bug in 2.6.17.11? Christian Schmid
2006-09-10 21:31 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-09-10 22:13 ` Christian Schmid
2006-09-10 22:37 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-09-10 23:35 ` Christian Schmid [this message]
2006-09-11 1:00 ` David Chinner
2006-09-11 12:31 ` Christian Schmid
2006-09-11 0:54 ` David Chinner
2006-09-11 12:29 ` Christian Schmid
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4504A12C.9090608@rapidforum.com \
--to=webmaster@rapidforum.com \
--cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.