All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>
To: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alexis Bruemmer <alexisb@us.ibm.com>, Mike Anderson <andmike@us.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] libsas: move ATA bits into a separate module
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:21:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4508A0A2.2080605@us.ibm.com> (raw)

Hi all,

Per James Bottomley's request, I've moved all the libsas SATA support
code into a separate module, named sas_ata.  To satisfy his further
requirement that libsas not require libata (and vice versa), ata_sas
maintains fixed function pointer tables to various required functions
within libsas and libata.  Unfortunately, this means that libsas and
libata both require sas_ata, but sas_ata is smaller than libata.
Unloads of libata/libsas at inopportune moments are prevented by
increasing the refcounts on both modules whenever libsas detects a SATA
device (and decreasing it when the device goes away, of course).  If the
module is removed from the .config, then all of hooks into libsas/libata
should go away.

This is a rough-cut at separating out the ATA code; please let me know
what I can improve.  At the moment, I can load and talk to SATA disks
with the module enabled, as well as watch nothing happen if the module
is not config'd in.

The patch is a bit large, so here's where it lives:
http://sweaglesw.net/~djwong/docs/sas-ata_2.patch

Thanks for any feedback that you can provide!

--D

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@us.ibm.com>

             reply	other threads:[~2006-09-14  0:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-14  0:21 Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2006-09-14 15:14 ` [PATCH] libsas: move ATA bits into a separate module Jeff Garzik
2006-09-14 22:40   ` [PATCH v3] " Darrick J. Wong
2006-09-14 22:49     ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-18 19:00     ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-09-18 21:47       ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-18 18:59 ` [PATCH] " Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4508A0A2.2080605@us.ibm.com \
    --to=djwong@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=alexisb@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=andmike@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.