Re: netdev tx timeouts

[Larry Finger <Larry.Finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>]

Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:49:23 +0200
> Michael Buesch <mb-fseUSCV1ubazQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> Simple. Reading the code of synchronize_net() and
>> netif_stop_queue() and thinking about why it breaks, instead
>> of committing bugfixes that only substitute one bug by another. ;)
>> I'll take a look, too.
> 
> Why are you doing the synchronize_net()? it is meant for RCU.

We know and it no longer is in the code. We have known for a couple of days that 
it was the synchronize_net() step that led to the netdev timeouts, but we were 
afraid that a bare netif_stop_queue would not be SMP safe. The current structure has

mutex_lock
netif_tx_disable(dev)   (equivalent to  netif_tx_lock_bh(dev);
				        netif_stop_queue(dev);
			                netif_tx_unlock_bh(dev);
spin_lock_irqsafe

I see you listed as a maintainer in several network-related parts of the system, 
so AFAIK, you are a network guru. Do you think this will work? I have tested 
code with just a netif_stop_queue (without the lock_bh/unlock_bh parts) on a UP 
system and have gotten no errors, but I do not have access to SMP hardware.

Thanks,

Larry