From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com>,
Linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch] MAINTAINERS: encourage testers to volunteer
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:20:57 +0159 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4509C7D0.8080108@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060914194411.GA669@stusta.de>
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 01:14:24PM -0600, Jim Cromie wrote:
>> Add a new entry-type into MAINTAINERS whereby folks with hardware can
>> volunteer to
>> test patches to the driver. It should encourage folks to put themselves
>> "on the hook"
>> in trade for a little bit of notoriety.
>>
>> Hopefully this will help improve:
>> - support for rare hardware
>> - QA on that hardware
>> - connections between hackers & testers
>> - would-be hackers can find new things to do, esp in less visited parts
>> of the dist.
>>
>> Additions should be approved by maintainers etc, but thats no different
>> than is currently done.
>
> There are currently 97 different saa7134 card types supported by the
> kernel. Do we need an entry for each of them (each card type has it's
> own specific support)?
It's utterly sufficient to know about only one person, who have that piece of
hardware in most cases -- to test the core of the driver, not all specific
parts. Something like to test it at least roughly.
> And this information will become outdated much faster than updated
> (even the maintainers entries are sometimes outdated).
When akpm proposed this, I agreed (but still have no contacts to post a patch),
because I needed somebody to test a driver I had rewritten a little bit, but
there was no place to take a look...
But his thoughts were a little bit different, he considered creating a separate
file named TESTERS and there have a list of these "qa people" (even for one
specific piece of hw if necessary). [I hope I did understand him correctly...]
>> --- doc-touches/MAINTAINERS~ 2006-09-14 11:50:03.000000000 -0600
>> +++ doc-touches/MAINTAINERS 2006-09-14 12:19:13.000000000 -0600
>> @@ -80,6 +80,12 @@
>> it has been replaced by a better system and you
>> should be using that.
>>
>> +V: Validation/Test contact and hardware they can test.
>> +
>> + Identifies folks who are willing to test driver patches, etc.
>> + Also can identify lack of hardware for otherwize maintained drivers
>> + by using 'none'
>> +
>> 3C359 NETWORK DRIVER
>> P: Mike Phillips
>> M: mikep@linuxtr.net
regards,
--
http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby/ Jiri Slaby
faculty of informatics, masaryk university, brno, cz
e-mail: jirislaby gmail com, gpg pubkey fingerprint:
B674 9967 0407 CE62 ACC8 22A0 32CC 55C3 39D4 7A7E
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-14 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-14 19:14 [RFC patch] MAINTAINERS: encourage testers to volunteer Jim Cromie
2006-09-14 19:44 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-14 21:21 ` Jiri Slaby [this message]
2006-09-15 6:41 ` Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4509C7D0.8080108@gmail.com \
--to=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=jim.cromie@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.