From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: rtsp-conntrack without needing NAT Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 06:40:12 +0200 Message-ID: <450A2EAC.8030701@trash.net> References: <20060914125154.GA4620@ekonomika.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist , Mickael Marchand , kulnet@kulnet.kuleuven.be Return-path: To: Steven Van Acker In-Reply-To: <20060914125154.GA4620@ekonomika.be> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Steven Van Acker wrote: > Hi, > > the rtsp-conntrack patch I found at > http://www.freenux.org/~mm/rtsp/2.6.15-rtsp.patch applies nicely to the > kernels I compile with Full NAT support, but not without. > > This is caused by calls to NAT functions from within ip_conntrack_rtsp.c > > For the past couple days, I've tried to make sense of connectiontracking > and NAT code and I believe my version of the patch should fix the > problem. > > I've compiled it without problems, and the modules load. > But since I've never really messed with kernel code before, I don't know > if I broke anything or introduced bugs anywhere. > > Maybe someone with more experience can look over the patch and see if it > makes sense ? You're more likely to find someone if you post your changes as a patch to the original version.