From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <450D3764.80601@domain.hid> Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 13:54:12 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9E87836FFB72CFBEE93B691B" Sender: jan.kiszka@domain.hid Subject: [Xenomai-core] official TSC model on SMP List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches, discussions\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: xenomai-core This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9E87836FFB72CFBEE93B691B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, reading through timer code of Xenomai I just wondered (again) what our official model of TSCs on multiprocessor boxes are: 1) (practically) perfectly synchronised without offset 2) synchronised but with (unknown?) offset 3) unsynchronised I'm asking because I worried about timestamps taken on external events like interrupts on one CPU and are then used to trigger some timed operation on another. Such things may easily happen via RTDM devices where we do not communicate the CPU source of event timestamps. But there is also other code influenced by the TSC model, e.g. data collection and evaluation for CPU load stats. Jan --------------enig9E87836FFB72CFBEE93B691B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFDTdnniDOoMHTA+kRAoaQAJ9O4q4GeYrm7rj14EigCr8xkwe47ACfaV+1 O9hlz16TuxOJbL7pasOcn+w= =PYEY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9E87836FFB72CFBEE93B691B--