From: John Richard Moser <nigelenki@comcast.net>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Scheduler tunables?
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:19:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <450D6786.7010404@comcast.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1158483845.6025.22.camel@Homer.simpson.net>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-09-16 at 19:19 -0400, John Richard Moser wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> It looks like the scheduler tunables have been removed from 2.6
>> somewhere before 2.6.17.
>
> Which tunables are you referring to?
>
>
http://kerneltrap.org/node/525
The relevant code changes in sysctl.h and sched.c seem to be undone. Of
course I'm assuming my distribution didn't just add a side patch in at
the time when I noticed these existed so long ago.
- --
All content of all messages exchanged herein are left in the
Public Domain, unless otherwise explicitly stated.
Creative brains are a valuable, limited resource. They shouldn't be
wasted on re-inventing the wheel when there are so many fascinating
new problems waiting out there.
-- Eric Steven Raymond
We will enslave their women, eat their children and rape their
cattle!
-- Bosc, Evil alien overlord from the fifth dimension
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org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=qLt2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-17 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-16 23:19 Scheduler tunables? John Richard Moser
2006-09-17 9:04 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-09-17 15:19 ` John Richard Moser [this message]
2006-09-17 19:19 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-09-17 18:47 ` John Richard Moser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=450D6786.7010404@comcast.net \
--to=nigelenki@comcast.net \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.