From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
To: "gilles.chanteperdrix" <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
Cc: xenomai-core <xenomai@xenomai.org>
Subject: [Xenomai-core] Re: rare brokenness in latency output - FPU bug!
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:28:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <450E9103.8080203@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <J5SF9Z$7F2EF49769B98E8D95E7CDDC32F233C4@domain.hid>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1465 bytes --]
gilles.chanteperdrix wrote:
> ---------- Debut du message initial -----------
>
> De : jan.kiszka@domain.hid
> A : "xenomai-core" xenomai@xenomai.org
> Chanteperdrix" gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org
> Copies :
> Date : Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:30:45 +0200
> Objet : rare brokenness in latency output - FPU bug!
>
>> Gilles, what info do you need? It's all the latest on x86 here:
>> 2.6.17.13 (.config attached), ipipe-1.4, SVN #1646, gcc4.1.0.
>
> It would be interesting if you could:
> - try reverting the last FPU changes
Meanwhile identified: 1595 for trunk, likely 1597 for 2.2.x (so 2.2.3 is
affected as well).
> - try to narrow down the issue by reducing the number of
> threads created
> by switchtest (for example, try keeping only the threads whose
> switch
> fails)
I tried both with "rtup0 rtup0 rtup_ufpp0 rtup_ufpp0" and only "rtup0
rtup_ufpp0", but that seems to work fine.
> - try dumping the FPU context before the first fp_regs_set,
> chances are that the FPU context is already clobbered before
> the first fp_regs_set;
I guess in rtup() in the switchtest driver, right? Will try.
> when the FPU context is already clobbered, running fp_regs_set
> set the
> value of the already set registers to qnan, and fp_regs_check
> returns
> INT_MAX when the register is set to qnan. I will send tomorrow
> the
> header I use for converting FPU contexts into human readable form.
>
TIA.
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 250 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-18 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-18 12:13 [Xenomai-core] Re:rare brokenness in latency output - FPU bug! gilles.chanteperdrix
2006-09-18 12:28 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=450E9103.8080203@domain.hid \
--to=jan.kiszka@domain.hid \
--cc=gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.