Re: problems with PLB_TEMAC & xilinx_gige driver under linux 2.4 ...

["David H. Lynch Jr." <dhlii@dlasys.net>]

    I do nto know much about Xilinx under 2.4 but I am pretty sure the 
gemac and the plb temac are similar but different
NIC's.

rimas wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> i am having problems using the xilinx_gige driver under linux 2.4.26 running 
> on  a Virtex-4 FX12 Mini Module board (from avnet).  I am using the plb_temac 
> and hard_temac blocks under ISE/EDK 8.1.02.
>
> the machine boots fine and the network interface seems to work okay but it 
> randomly panics sometimes (rather quickly if i'm generating network traffic):
>
> Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 4
> NIP: C00DA340 XER: 20000000 LR: C00D34F8 SP: C3945B20 REGS: c3945a70 TRAP: 
> 0700
>     Not tainted
> MSR: 00009030 EE: 1 PR: 0 FP: 0 ME: 1 IR/DR: 11
> TASK = c3944000[52] 'telnetd' Last syscall: 4
> last math 00000000 last altivec 00000000
> GPR00: 00000004 C3945B20 C3944000 C02E49F4 C02E4800 00000004 00000001 C0456260
> GPR08: C0177424 00000031 C50D8000 00021F03 0008C8E4 10122AA8 00000000 C01A0000
> GPR16: 00000000 0000001A 00000000 C3945F18 00001032 03945BA0 00000000 C00038E0
> GPR24: C0004800 00000020 C04C06E0 C01864E0 C3945BB0 0000001F 00000000 C02E49F4
> Call backtrace:
> C0190000 C00D34F8 C0004748 C000483C C00038E0 C00D398C C00F8094
> C00EE04C C01039B0 C0104D70 C0115570 C01163A8 C010A600 C012A61C
> C00E52F4 C00E5574 C003AB2C C000369C 100572BC 10005064 10005108
> 0FD9221C 00000000
> Kernel panic: Aiee, killing interrupt handler!
> In interrupt handler - not syncing
>   <0>Rebooting in 180 seconds..
>
> it always causes a trap on the same instruction (c00da340) which is inside of
> XTemac_IntrFifoHandler()
>
> c00da330:       81 6a 00 28     lwz     r11,40(r10)
> c00da334:       0c 0b 00 00     twi     0,r11,0
> c00da338:       4c 00 01 2c     isync
> c00da33c:       81 2a 00 20     lwz     r9,32(r10)
> c00da340:       0c 09 00 00     twi     0,r9,0
> c00da344:       4c 00 01 2c     isync
>
> this code corresponds to two consecutive in_be32() calls
>
> extern inline unsigned in_be32(volatile unsigned *addr)
> {
> 	unsigned ret;
>
> 	__asm__ __volatile__("lwz%U1%X1 %0,%1;\n"
> 			     "twi 0,%0,0;\n"
> 			     "isync" : "=r" (ret) : "m" (*addr));
> 	return ret;
> }
>
> resulting from this line of code:
>
> CorePending = XTemac_mGetIpifReg(XTE_IPIER_OFFSET) & 
> XTemac_mGetIpifReg(XTE_IPISR_OFFSET);
>
> i recently got a new mini module that has the later stepping of the V4FX12 
> part (PVR 20011470) so I got rid of the patch i had applied to disable the 
> caches  (which was required on the earlier stepping of the part to get the 
> board to even boot reliably).
>
> I still have the patch applied which sets bits 1 and 3 in the CCR0 register.
>
> does anyone have any clue as to what's going on and what to do about it ?
>
> this problem seems rather non-deterministic and weird, i can't help but think 
> its likely related to some silicon errata or something but nothing on this 
> page
>
> http://www.xilinx.com/xlnx/xil_ans_display.jsp?iCountryID=1&iLanguageID=1&getPagePath=20658&BV_SessionID=@@@@0135296752.1158623889@@@@&BV_EngineID=cccdaddikmdkkifcefeceihdffhdfkf.0
>
> seems to apply
>
> any advice is very greatly appreciated !
>
> -rimas
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
> Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
>   


-- 
Dave Lynch 					  	    DLA Systems
Software Development:  				         Embedded Linux
717.627.3770 	       dhlii@dlasys.net 	  http://www.dlasys.net
fax: 1.253.369.9244 			           Cell: 1.717.587.7774
Over 25 years' experience in platforms, languages, and technologies too numerous to list.

"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction."
Albert Einstein