From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <451068AD.6080000@domain.hid> Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 17:01:17 -0500 From: Jeff Webb MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai v2.2.3 References: <1158564530.5020.5.camel@domain.hid> <450F1686.3010304@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <450F1686.3010304@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: xenomai@xenomai.org Jeff Webb wrote: > Philippe Gerum wrote: >> Here is the third maintenance release for the v2.2.x branch. >> ... > > This release works fine on my 2.6 kernel x86 machine, with the exception > of the FPU problems noted elsewhere. > > I have the following problems with my 2.4 kernel x86 machine: > * The latency and switchtest test programs yield segmentation faults. > * My own user-space test programs seg fault. > > Things that work: > * The kernel boots and runs fine. > * xeno_native, _posix, _rtai all insert and remove without problems. > * Some simple kernel module test programs work fine. > > I am using the same config as I was for 2.2.2 (which worked fine), but I > am running a slightly newer kernel version (2.4.33.3 as opposed to 2.4.32). I was able to build a working xenomai-2.2.3 by using linux-2.4.32 and adeos-ipipe-2.4.32-i386-1.2-07.patch. The latency and switchtest programs seem to work now. My problematic build used linux-2.4.33.3 and the adeos-ipipe-2.4.33-i386-1.3-00.patch. I used the same kernel config for both builds. So, does this mean the problem is with the ipipe patch? This machine is an AMD Athlon(tm) XP 3200+, gcc version 3.3.2, Fedora Core 1. -Jeff