From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: Per-cpu patches on top of PDA stuff... Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 15:36:41 -0700 Message-ID: <451070F9.1080800@goop.org> References: <1158635617.21726.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> <450FA6FB.9020100@goop.org> <20060919210334.GB7474@sequoia.sous-sol.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20060919210334.GB7474@sequoia.sous-sol.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Chris Wright Cc: Andrew Morton , virtualization , Ingo Molnar , Andi Kleen List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org Chris Wright wrote: > I agree. We're right in the middle of the last bit of Xen bring up. > PDA is not strictly needed, and destabilizing for this would be counter > productive. > = Well, the basic PDA stuff is already in there, and seems OK now. I = don't want to revisit it until everything else looks sound though. J