From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.dvmed.net (srv5.dvmed.net [207.36.208.214]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2945467B59 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 11:19:06 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <451096FE.1000104@pobox.com> Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 21:18:54 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove powerpc specific parts of 3c509 driver References: <20060919145433.8fc7d478.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20060919184243.GL29167@austin.ibm.com> <45103C62.4080003@genesi-usa.com> <1158708269.6002.186.camel@localhost.localdomain> <488875E7-CCBC-47E1-A273-A2D037A997B2@kernel.crashing.org> <45109203.6060606@pobox.com> <1192ED41-329C-4CB0-AD87-B3BF62EC4337@kernel.crashing.org> In-Reply-To: <1192ED41-329C-4CB0-AD87-B3BF62EC4337@kernel.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: akpm@osdl.org, Stephen Rothwell , ppc-dev , netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Segher Boessenkool wrote: >>> Sure, PCI busses are little-endian. But is readX()/writeX() for PCI >>> only? >> >> Yes. >> >> For other buses, use foo_writel(), etc. > > Can this please be documented then? Never heard this before... You have come late to the party. This has been the case for many, many years. And there is no point in a massive rename to pci_writel(), either. Jeff From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove powerpc specific parts of 3c509 driver Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 21:18:54 -0400 Message-ID: <451096FE.1000104@pobox.com> References: <20060919145433.8fc7d478.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20060919184243.GL29167@austin.ibm.com> <45103C62.4080003@genesi-usa.com> <1158708269.6002.186.camel@localhost.localdomain> <488875E7-CCBC-47E1-A273-A2D037A997B2@kernel.crashing.org> <45109203.6060606@pobox.com> <1192ED41-329C-4CB0-AD87-B3BF62EC4337@kernel.crashing.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Matt Sealey , akpm@osdl.org, Stephen Rothwell , ppc-dev , netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:44746 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750839AbWITBTI (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Sep 2006 21:19:08 -0400 To: Segher Boessenkool In-Reply-To: <1192ED41-329C-4CB0-AD87-B3BF62EC4337@kernel.crashing.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Segher Boessenkool wrote: >>> Sure, PCI busses are little-endian. But is readX()/writeX() for PCI >>> only? >> >> Yes. >> >> For other buses, use foo_writel(), etc. > > Can this please be documented then? Never heard this before... You have come late to the party. This has been the case for many, many years. And there is no point in a massive rename to pci_writel(), either. Jeff