From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@domain.hid>
To: niklaus.giger@domain.hid
Cc: xenomai-core <xenomai@xenomai.org>
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] FPU-Problems on a system without FPU?
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 09:10:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4510E983.3040105@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200609200806.47379.niklaus.giger@domain.hid>
Niklaus Giger wrote:
> Hi
>
> I studied a little bit my buildbot reports on a PPC405 (without FPU) regarding
> the FPU problem. Grepping through the saved reports on the server enabled me
> to pinpoint the changes quickly. I found the following situation:
>
> Last good check with the quick build was build 58 1604
> http://ngiger.dyndns.org/buildbot/hcu3_q/builds/58/step-xenotest/0
>
> First bad check with the quick build was build 59 with revision 1605
> http://ngiger.dyndns.org/buildbot/hcu3_q/builds/59/step-xenotest/0
>
> But the full build 13 with revision 1604 already had the failure!
> http://ngiger.dyndns.org/buildbot/hcu3_f/builds/13/step-xenotest/0
> The full build 12 had revision 1599 and was good.
> http://ngiger.dyndns.org/buildbot/hcu3_f/builds/12/step-xenotest/0
>
> May be this helps to pinpoint the FPU problem a bit.
>
> Question: Is reporting 1 != 2 always the expected output of the FPU check?
>
> A bad check looks like:
> == Testing FPU cXenomai: suspending kernel thread c1ba8ea0 ('rtk5/0') at
> 0xc30303ec after exception #1792
> heck routines...
> r0: 1 != 2
> <..>
> r31: 1 != 2
> == FPU check routines: OK.
> == Threads: sleeper_ufps-0 rtk-1 rtk-2 rtk_fp-3 rtk_fp-4 rtk_fp_ufpp-5
> rtk_fp_ufpp-6 rtup-7 rtup-8 rtup_ufpp-9 rtup_ufpp-10 rtus-11 rtus-12
> rtus_ufps-13 rtus_ufps-14 rtuo-15 rtuo-16 rtuo_ufpp-17 rtuo_ufpp-18
> rtuo_ufps-19 rtuo_ufps-20 rtuo_ufpp_ufps-21 rtuo_ufpp_ufps-22
> RTT| 00:01:59
> RTH|ctx switches|-------total
> RTD| 5| 5
>
>
> Unfortunately I still do not have a x86-box at home where I could run buildbot
> including xeno-test.
On a system without FPU you have to run this test with the option "-n".
Gilles fixed a bug around that recently. You need commit 1603, at least.
(look for the thread "switchtest on systems without FPU").
Wolfgang.
x
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-20 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-20 6:06 [Xenomai-core] FPU-Problems on a system without FPU? Niklaus Giger
2006-09-20 7:10 ` Wolfgang Grandegger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4510E983.3040105@domain.hid \
--to=wg@domain.hid \
--cc=niklaus.giger@domain.hid \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.