From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <45118754.3000001@domain.hid> Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:24:20 -0500 From: Jeff Webb MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai v2.2.3 References: <1158564530.5020.5.camel@domain.hid> <450F1686.3010304@domain.hid> <451068AD.6080000@domain.hid> <1158744278.5544.42.camel@domain.hid> <451153D5.2080200@domain.hid> <1158768864.5043.31.camel@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <1158768864.5043.31.camel@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: xenomai@xenomai.org Philippe Gerum wrote: > On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 09:44 -0500, Jeff Webb wrote: > >> Switching to xenomai-2.2.3/linux-2.4.32 (ipipe-1.2) fixed this problem. > > Could you try running 2.2.3 stock + fpu fix patch over 2.4.33.3/1.3-00, > and 2.2.3 stock over 2.4.33.3/1.2-08 ? I'm trying to find out if there > is a dependency on the kernel version, and/or the Adeos release, and/or > the fpu issue, for the segfault bug. TIA, I just tested two more builds. Both of them have the segfault bug. Here is a summary of the results thus far: Latency test works: linux-2.4.32, adeos-ipipe-2.4.32-i386-1.2-07.patch Latency test segfaults: linux-2.4.33.3, adeos-ipipe-2.4.33-i386-1.3-00.patch linux-2.4.33.3, adeos-ipipe-2.4.33-i386-1.2-07.patch linux-2.4.33.3 (+ FPU fix patch), adeos-ipipe-2.4.33-i386-1.3-00.patch All of these are with xenomai-2.2.3. The last one has the FPU fix patch applied. So, it appears to be something in the newer kernel version... Thanks, Jeff