Re: [PATCH -mm] rescue large xfs preferred iosize from the inode diet patch

[Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>]

Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Timothy Shimmin wrote:
> 
>> Looked at your patch and then at our xfs code in the tree and
>> the existing code is different than what yours is based on.
>> I then noticed in the logs Nathan has actually made changes for this:
>>
>> ----------------------------
>> revision 1.254
>> date: 2006/07/17 10:46:05;  author: nathans;  state: Exp;  lines: +20 -5
>> modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:26565a
>> Update XFS for i_blksize removal from generic inode structure
>> ----------------------------
>> I even reviewed the change (and I don't remember it - getting old).
>>
>> I looked at the mods scheduled for 2.6.19 and this is one of them.
>>
>> So the fix for this is coming soon (and the fix is different from the
>> one above).
> 
> 
> Ah, ok, thanks guys.  Should have checked CVS I guess.
> 
> -Eric
> 

cc -= lkml;

actually the patch nathan put in seems like a lot of replicated code.

http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/xfs-linux/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c.diff?r1=text&tr1=1.254&r2=text&tr2=1.253&f=h

But maybe he's solving some problem I didn't think of.

Any idea what?

-Eric