All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ludovic Drolez <ludovic.drolez@linbox.com>
To: Vincent Pelletier <vincent.plr@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched.c: Be a bit more conservative in SMP
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:24:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45138FAC.30700@linbox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200609212036.24856.vincent.plr@wanadoo.fr>

Vincent Pelletier wrote:
> Maybe I was completely wrong with my assumption that one running process 
> always has an impact of 1, which would have make the scheduler underestimate 
> the load on one cpu and put too many processes on it, without moving them 
> afterward.

Yes, maybe that's the problem, since in my bench, one process takes only 40% of 
the CPU.

Cheers,

-- 
Ludovic DROLEZ                              Linbox / Free&ALter Soft
www.linbox.com www.linbox.org	              tel: +33 3 87 50 87 90
152 rue de Grigy - Technopole Metz 2000                   57070 METZ

  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-22  7:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-03 13:41 [PATCH] sched.c: Be a bit more conservative in SMP Vincent Pelletier
2006-09-03 17:10 ` Vincent Pelletier
2006-09-06 23:30   ` Vincent Pelletier
2006-09-19 14:06     ` Ludovic Drolez
2006-09-19 17:50       ` Antonio Vargas
2006-09-20  7:42         ` Ludovic Drolez
2006-09-20 16:26           ` Poor scheduling when not loaded at 100% (Was: [PATCH] sched.c: Be a bit more conservative in SMP) Ludovic Drolez
2006-09-21 18:36           ` [PATCH] sched.c: Be a bit more conservative in SMP Vincent Pelletier
2006-09-22  7:24             ` Ludovic Drolez [this message]
2006-09-22 12:31               ` Antonio Vargas
2006-09-19 13:39 ` Ludovic

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45138FAC.30700@linbox.com \
    --to=ludovic.drolez@linbox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.plr@wanadoo.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.