From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Erik Slagter <erik@slagter.name>
Subject: Re: writing a cpufreq driver
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:31:56 +0200
Message-ID: <45140FFC.1060305@slagter.name>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk>
List-Id: <cpufreq.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@lists.linux.org.uk?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linux.org.uk/mailman/private/cpufreq>
List-Post: <mailto:cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk>
List-Help: <mailto:cpufreq-request@lists.linux.org.uk?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@lists.linux.org.uk?subject=subscribe>
Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk
Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk

> I'm now sure the southbridge is throttling the processor...

I was always told that throttling the processor doesn't yield any
powersaving? And that is exactly what my last two motherboards show.