All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lluis Batle <viriketo@gmail.com>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Problem with routing decisions, and multihop
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 17:32:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45219fb0050704083253774af5@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45219fb005070408323197bfa4@mail.gmail.com>

No, everything is right in its output:
1.1.1.1 via 192.168.16.2 dev eth1  src 192.168.16.1
    cache  mtu 1500 advmss 1460 metric10 64
2.2.2.2 via 192.168.17.2 dev eth2  src 192.168.17.1
    cache  mtu 1500 advmss 1460 metric10 64
3.3.3.3 via 192.168.16.2 dev eth1  src 192.168.16.1
    cache  mtu 1500 advmss 1460 metric10 64
4.4.4.4 via 192.168.17.2 dev eth2  src 192.168.17.1
    cache  mtu 1500 advmss 1460 metric10 64
5.5.5.5 via 192.168.16.2 dev eth1  src 192.168.16.1
    cache  mtu 1500 advmss 1460 metric10 64
6.6.6.6 via 192.168.17.2 dev eth2  src 192.168.17.1
    cache  mtu 1500 advmss 1460 metric10 64
7.7.7.7 via 192.168.16.2 dev eth1  src 192.168.16.1
    cache  mtu 1500 advmss 1460 metric10 64
8.8.8.8 via 192.168.17.2 dev eth2  src 192.168.17.1
    cache  mtu 1500 advmss 1460 metric10 64
9.9.9.9 via 192.168.16.2 dev eth1  src 192.168.16.1
    cache  mtu 1500 advmss 1460 metric10 64
10.10.10.10 via 192.168.17.2 dev eth2  src 192.168.17.1
    cache  mtu 1500 advmss 1460 metric10 64

About the 16.x and 17.x addresses... yes, there are other routers,
which make NAT (192.168.16.2 and 192.168.17.2) to internet.

On 7/4/05, /dev/rob0 <rob0@gmx.co.uk> wrote:
> On Monday 04 July 2005 10:07, I wrote:
> > Are multiple "ip route get ip.add.re.ss" commands in sequence showing
> > routes out the same interface?
>
> for X in `seq 10` ; do /sbin/ip route get $X.$X.$X.$X ; done
> --
>     mail to this address is discarded unless "/dev/rob0"
>     or "not-spam" is in Subject: header
>
>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-07-04 15:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-04 14:15 Problem with routing decisions, and multihop Lluís Batlle
2005-07-04 14:21 ` Lluis Batle
2005-07-04 14:32 ` Lluis Batle
2005-07-04 15:07   ` /dev/rob0
2005-07-04 15:10     ` /dev/rob0
     [not found]       ` <45219fb005070408323197bfa4@mail.gmail.com>
2005-07-04 15:32         ` Lluis Batle [this message]
2005-07-04 16:33           ` /dev/rob0
2005-07-04 16:54             ` Lluís Batlle
2005-07-04 18:06               ` /dev/rob0
2005-07-05  5:52                 ` Lluís Batlle
2005-07-05  7:46                   ` Problem with routing decisions, and multihop (solved) Lluís Batlle
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-04 14:52 Problem with routing decisions, and multihop Lluís Batlle i Rossell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45219fb0050704083253774af5@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=viriketo@gmail.com \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.