From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Llu=EDs_Batlle?= Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 15:26:05 +0000 Subject: [LARTC] Trying the configuration in nano.txt Message-Id: <45219fb0050705082620853a6@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Hi! (I sent other mails some time ago, about not-using the Julian's patches). When I try the configuration from Nano.txt, having the Julian's patches applied, only the first 'hop' of the routing table "222" is used (according to tables shown in Nano.txt). I saw that this question was asked some time ago, with no answer. Maybe someone can tell me the solution? The routing policy rules/tables are the same, as I sent in my last email, but with this table 222: default proto static nexthop via 192.168.16.2 dev eth1 weight 1 nexthop via 192.168.17.2 dev eth2 weight 1 Even trying lots of "ip route get x.x.x.x", always the first hop is chosen. Everything is written according to Nano.txt (I think :). Thanks! _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc