From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Llu=EDs_Batlle?= Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 09:27:45 +0000 Subject: Fwd: [LARTC] Trying the configuration in nano.txt Message-Id: <45219fb0050706022739bf840e@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org On 7/6/05, Vinay wrote: > Hi, > I had 3 cards, eth0 and eth1 connecting to 2 isps and eth2 > connecting to lan. First i setup the address configuration for these > cards without the gateway option. So i specified only Ip address and > netmask. Then i gave the masquerade option for both the network cards > and made necessary chnages in the firewall. Next I executed the > script which i got from > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2003q4/010372.html. After > running the script the system was using both the connections . But > since i hadnt use the patch, it was not able to detect the dead > gateway. So if one of the link goes down, it creates problem. I tried that way, and routing works _only for local connections_. It doesn't work for NAT connections. So, the result is the same, as the configuration I was trying is the same, which is set in the script you gave. :) > > Can u please explain how u have applied the patch . I have not applied the patch in the configuration I'm trying to get working :) So, by now, I don't use that patch. I explain howI think the multipath routing + NAT doesn't work, in a mail I just sent. :) But as there I explained how I understand that nothing may work without patches (in the mail sent to the list, before this one), I'll start trying with the patches applied. I applied them to a vanilla kernel by: cd /usr/src/linux patch -p1 < the_patch.diff This results in changing some files, as expected. So the patching should be well done. Thanks! _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc