From: "Lluís Batlle" <viriketo@gmail.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Trying the configuration in nano.txt
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 15:40:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45219fb0050706084035a08b63@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45219fb0050705082620853a6@mail.gmail.com>
UF. Sorry. I answered stupidly to your email. You replied about the
Julian's patches... I've sent a big amount of email, and not only
about a single configuration.
I don't know why, but now the patches work. I swear I haven't changed
anything in my configuration; simply, after rebooting, some minutes
without changing anything, everything worked. Strange, strange.
So, it works.
Thanks! - Wow, I've learnt a lot about netfilter and policy routing...
On 7/6/05, Lluís Batlle <viriketo@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/6/05, Vinay <vinayamar@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I had 3 cards, eth0 and eth1 connecting to 2 isps and eth2
> > connecting to lan. First i setup the address configuration for these
> > cards without the gateway option. So i specified only Ip address and
> > netmask. Then i gave the masquerade option for both the network cards
> > and made necessary chnages in the firewall. Next I executed the
> > script which i got from
> > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2003q4/010372.html. After
> > running the script the system was using both the connections . But
> > since i hadnt use the patch, it was not able to detect the dead
> > gateway. So if one of the link goes down, it creates problem.
> I tried that way, and routing works _only for local connections_. It
> doesn't work for NAT connections. So, the result is the same, as the
> configuration I was trying is the same, which is set in the script you
> gave. :)
>
> >
> > Can u please explain how u have applied the patch .
> I have not applied the patch in the configuration I'm trying to get
> working :) So, by now, I don't use that patch. I explain howI think
> the multipath routing + NAT doesn't work, in a mail I just sent. :)
> But as there I explained how I understand that nothing may work
> without patches (in the mail sent to the list, before this one), I'll
> start trying with the patches applied. I applied them to a vanilla
> kernel by:
> cd /usr/src/linux
> patch -p1 < the_patch.diff
>
> This results in changing some files, as expected. So the patching
> should be well done.
>
> Thanks!
>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-06 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-05 15:26 [LARTC] Trying the configuration in nano.txt Lluís Batlle
2005-07-06 15:40 ` Lluís Batlle [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45219fb0050706084035a08b63@mail.gmail.com \
--to=viriketo@gmail.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.