From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from jazzdrum.ncsc.mil (zombie.ncsc.mil [144.51.88.131]) by tarius.tycho.ncsc.mil (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k93LPjdA026965 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 17:25:45 -0400 Received: from exchange.columbia.tresys.com (jazzdrum.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.7]) by jazzdrum.ncsc.mil (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k93LOZqf024499 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 21:24:35 GMT Message-ID: <4522D554.7080708@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 17:25:40 -0400 From: Joshua Brindle MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linda Knippers CC: Joy Latten , eparis@parisplace.org, redhat-lspp@redhat.com, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, jmorris@namei.org, paul.moore@hp.com, vyekkirala@TrustedCS.com Subject: Re: RHEL5 Kernel with labeled networking References: <200610031837.k93Ib7cQ003247@faith.austin.ibm.com> <4522B79C.2060405@gentoo.org> <1159902988.29928.2.camel@faith.austin.ibm.com> <4522CAB7.6090109@hp.com> In-Reply-To: <4522CAB7.6090109@hp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Linda Knippers wrote: > Joy Latten wrote: > >> On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 15:18 -0400, Joshua Brindle wrote: >> >> >>> Joy Latten wrote: >>> >>> >>>>> Before network labeling is completed we still need some work >>>>> implementing how we plan to audit configuration changes in ipsec >>>>> labeling decisions. I believe we agreed today that this auditing must >>>>> be done in kernelspace since we do not have fine grained enough controls >>>>> on netlink messages to allow for all of the auditing in userspace. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I've talked to Klaus about what needs to be audited for ipsec and >>>> lspp compliance. I will begin work on a patch and get this out >>>> to the list as soon as I can. We will audit everytime a policy is >>>> added/removed to/from the ipsec policy database. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> why not just auditallow all association setcontext? >>> >> Dang! Why didn't I think of that! :-) >> Such a good idea. I will do a quick test and >> show Klaus and see if it all looks ok to him. >> Thanks!!! >> > > If we go the auditallow route then we lose some audit record management > features, like the ability to enable/disble/search for these records, > don't we? Do we care? > > enable and disable with a boolean searching? surely you can search avc records.. -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.