All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] call truncate_inode_pages in the DIO fallback to buffered I/O path
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 11:40:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45240034.2040704@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061004111603.20cdaa35.akpm@osdl.org>


> We have lots of nice new tools in-kernel which permit applications to
> manipulate and to invalidate pagecache.  Please, start using them rather
> than pushing bits of oracle into the core vfs ;)

And apps that were written before they were available? :)  We're OK with
their behaviour changing under newer kernels because they now have a
previous source of memory pressure that they didn't have before?

It seems a bit much to suggest that retaining the previous behaviour of
avoiding memory pressure by using the O_DIRECT API is somehow "pushing
bits of oracle into the core vfs" :).

Maybe that aspect of the API was unintentional, though.  That would be a
shame.  I suspect Oracle isn't alone in relying on it.

> Please, no truncate_inode_pages.  For this application, the far-safer
> invalidate_inode_pages() would suffice.

So now apps always have to pay the cost of looking up pages to
invalidate on the off chance that they wrote to a sparse region, based
on the current implementation detail that sparse regions fall back to
buffered?

- z

  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-04 18:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-04 17:04 [patch] call truncate_inode_pages in the DIO fallback to buffered I/O path Jeff Moyer
2006-10-04 17:25 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-04 17:51   ` Zach Brown
2006-10-04 17:53     ` Jeff Moyer
2006-10-04 18:16       ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-04 18:40         ` Zach Brown [this message]
2006-10-04 19:16           ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-04 20:53             ` Jeff Moyer
2006-10-04 21:22               ` Jeff Moyer
2006-10-04 23:55               ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-05 19:31                 ` Jeff Moyer
2006-10-06 20:11                   ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-11 16:48                     ` jmoyer
2006-10-11 18:37                       ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-12 22:01                         ` Jeff Moyer
2006-10-12 22:37                           ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45240034.2040704@oracle.com \
    --to=zach.brown@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.