From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH,RFC 0/17] 32-on-64 work progress
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 11:41:33 +0200
Message-ID: <4524D34D.1050508@suse.de>
References: <4523EEB2.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <4523EEB2.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Jan Beulich wrote:
> In an attempt to get some feedback on the ways I'm currently implementing
> this, I'm sending the set of patches as I currently have them. These permit
> a 32-bit PAE Linux dom0 kernel to come up on a 64-bit hypervisor, but
> progress only goes this far currently (very early during invocation of the
> first user mode code page table permissions aren't set correctly yet, making
> Xen kill the guest).

Patches don't apply for me, which changeset these patches are based on?

cheers,

  Gerd

-- 
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@suse.de>
http://www.suse.de/~kraxel/julika-dora.jpeg