From: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@googlemail.com>
To: Ladislav Michl <ladis@mips-linux.cz>
Cc: linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: Fix warning in clock.c
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:22:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45250702.2030806@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061005074857.GA10371@orphique>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 846 bytes --]
Ladislav Michl wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 03:28:43PM +0200, Dirk Behme wrote:
>
>>Fix warning
>>
>>arch/arm/mach-omap1/clock.c: In function
>>'omap1_clk_enable_generic':
>>arch/arm/mach-omap1/clock.c:499: warning: 'return' with no
>>value, in function returning non-void
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme_at_gmail.com>
>>
>
>>--- ./arch/arm/mach-omap1/clock.c_orig 2006-10-04 15:07:39.000000000 +0200
>>+++ ./arch/arm/mach-omap1/clock.c 2006-10-04 15:09:41.000000000 +0200
>>@@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ static int omap1_clk_enable_generic(stru
>> }
>> }
>>
>>- return;
>>+ return 0;
>> }
>
>
> Does it make sense to return any vaule at all? This functions return
> always 0. Perhaps in case there is no enable reg it should return
> something else. Btw, can this code run on omap2 cpu?
What's about something like in attachment?
[-- Attachment #2: clock_warning_patch.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1114 bytes --]
--- ./arch/arm/mach-omap1/clock.c_orig 2006-10-05 15:10:17.000000000 +0200
+++ ./arch/arm/mach-omap1/clock.c 2006-10-05 15:14:26.000000000 +0200
@@ -432,8 +432,7 @@ static int omap1_clk_enable(struct clk *
}
if (clk->flags & CLOCK_NO_IDLE_PARENT)
- if (!cpu_is_omap24xx())
- omap1_clk_deny_idle(clk->parent);
+ omap1_clk_deny_idle(clk->parent);
}
ret = clk->enable(clk);
@@ -454,8 +453,7 @@ static void omap1_clk_disable(struct clk
if (likely(clk->parent)) {
omap1_clk_disable(clk->parent);
if (clk->flags & CLOCK_NO_IDLE_PARENT)
- if (!cpu_is_omap24xx())
- omap1_clk_allow_idle(clk->parent);
+ omap1_clk_allow_idle(clk->parent);
}
}
}
@@ -471,7 +469,7 @@ static int omap1_clk_enable_generic(stru
if (unlikely(clk->enable_reg == 0)) {
printk(KERN_ERR "clock.c: Enable for %s without enable code\n",
clk->name);
- return 0;
+ return -EINVAL;
}
if (clk->flags & ENABLE_REG_32BIT) {
@@ -496,7 +494,7 @@ static int omap1_clk_enable_generic(stru
}
}
- return;
+ return 0;
}
static void omap1_clk_disable_generic(struct clk *clk)
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-05 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-04 13:28 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: Fix warning in clock.c Dirk Behme
2006-10-05 7:48 ` Ladislav Michl
2006-10-05 13:22 ` Dirk Behme [this message]
2006-10-06 12:52 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45250702.2030806@gmail.com \
--to=dirk.behme@googlemail.com \
--cc=ladis@mips-linux.cz \
--cc=linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.