From: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu
Subject: v2.6.19-rc1 regression: printk missing klogd wakeup
Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2006 01:03:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4526E0AC.9070105@imap.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <72sfz-wa-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1677 bytes --]
Unsurprisingly, v2.6.19-rc1 still contains the problem I reported
for v2.6.18-rc1 under the subject "Linux v2.6.18-rc1: printk delays"
and later (unfortunately not before it made it into v2.6.18) tracked
down through bisecting to
[a0f1ccfd8d37457a6d8a9e01acebeefcdfcc306e] lockdep: do not recurse in printk
Problem description:
> While X is running, output from printk() appears in syslog (eg.
> /var/log/messages) only after a key is pressed on the system keyboard,
> even though it is visible with dmesg immediately.
(from lkml message <450BF1CC.2070309@imap.cc> - see that message
for further details)
The problem did not exist in 2.6.17, so I think it qualifies as a
regression.
The following naive patch fixes the problem for me, without any
apparent ill effects (ie. the menace of lockup never manifested
itself):
--- a/kernel/printk.c 2006-10-07 00:51:09.000000000 +0200
+++ b/kernel/printk.c 2006-10-07 00:51:41.000000000 +0200
@@ -826,8 +826,7 @@ void release_console_sem(void)
* from within the scheduler code, then do not lock
* up due to self-recursion:
*/
- if (!lockdep_internal())
- wake_up_interruptible(&log_wait);
+ wake_up_interruptible(&log_wait);
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_console_sem);
But I guess for a proper fix the if() condition should rather be
refined a bit than thrown out completely.
--
Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc
Bonn, Germany
Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.
Ungeoeffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rueckseite)
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 253 bytes --]
next parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-06 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <72sfz-wa-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-10-06 23:03 ` Tilman Schmidt [this message]
2006-10-09 8:26 ` [patch] lockdep: fix printk recursion logic Ingo Molnar
2006-10-06 23:28 ` v2.6.19-rc1 build warnings Tilman Schmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4526E0AC.9070105@imap.cc \
--to=tilman@imap.cc \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.